Jump to Navigation

Can We Help You?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

News

Case Summaries

Injury & Tort Law

[05/21] Ateliers de la Haute-Garonne v. Broet Je Automation USA Inc.
In action in which plaintiff asserted counts of patent infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition, and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, the district court's ruling that the claims in suit are invalid for failure to disclose the best mode of carrying out the invention related to the process for distributing rivets is: 1) reversed in part, as to the judgment of invalidity on best mode grounds; 2) affirmed in part, that the patent was not abandoned; and 3) remanded for determination of the remaining issues.

[05/21] Hinojos v. Kohl's Corporation
District court's dismissal of claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Fair Advertising Law, and Consumer Legal Remedies Act brought by a plaintiff in a putative class action against defendant alleging false advertising, is reversed, where: 1) a consumer has "lost money or property" so long as false advertisements induced him to buy a product he would not have purchased or to spend more than he otherwise would have spent, and thus has standing to sue under the Unfair Competition Law and Fair Advertising Law because he has suffered an economic injury; 2) for the same reasons, plaintiff states a claim under the California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act; and 3) defendant' motion to certify the issues to the California Supreme Court both on the merits and because defendant only requested certification for the first time after oral argument.

[05/21] Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Summary judgment for defendant on plaintiff's claim that defendant violated his right of publicity for using plaintiff's likeness and biographical information in its NCAA Football series of videogames is reversed and remanded, where: 1) the NCAA Football 2004, 2005 and 2006 games at issue in this case do not sufficiently transform plaintiff's identity to escape the right of publicity claim; and 2) the only apparent use of plaintiff's likeness in NCAA Football 2009 (the photograph) is protected by the First Amendment, plaintiff's overall claim for violation of his right of publicity should have survived defendant's motion for summary judgment.

[05/20] Sebelius v. Cloer
An untimely petition under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act may qualify for an award of attorney's fees if it is filed in good faith and there is a reasonable basis for its claim.

Read More

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Notable Cases

$12 Million - Settlement for Minority Shareholder in Breach of Contract Case. The firm successfully represented a minority shareholder in a large privately held corporation. The Chief Executive Officer of the corporation agreed to repurchase the shares and then breached that agreement. The firm obtained over $12 million for the minority shareholder.  Read More

$5.5 million - Medical Malpractice Verdict Wert v. Weiser, et al., No. 99VS15524D. The firm successfully represented the Plaintiffs...  Read More

$4,500,000.00 - Judgment. Fried & Bonder obtained a 4.5 million dollar judgment on behalf of its client who was injured while a passenger in a company owned truck. Because he was not an employee of the company, the Defendant argued...  Read More

See All Notable Cases

Read Our Blog

Articles

Office Location

Fried & Bonder, LLC
White Provision, Suite 305
1170 Howell Mill Road, NW

Atlanta, GA 30318

Phone: 404-963-9443
Toll Free: 866-439-2018
Fax: 404-995-8899
Atlanta Law Office Map

The attorneys of Fried & Bonder, LLC, in Atlanta, Georgia, represent clients nationwide and statewide in Georgia, including Cherokee, Clarke, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, and Rockdale counties, and cities such as Alpharetta, Athens, Buckhead, Cartersville, Conyers, Covington, Cumming, Dalton, Decatur, Douglasville, Fayetteville, Forsyth, Griffin, Jasper, Jonesboro, Lawrenceville, Marietta, McDonough, Milton, Riverdale, Rome, Roswell, and Stockbridge.

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing® by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.